Laying 8 mm terrazzo over an existing floor: when it works
The figures, and where each one comes from
| The floor under it | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Sound, level, clean | the normal case |
| Sound but cracked | ⛔ the crack follows through, or the system has to change |
| Slab on a suspended frame | ⛔ deflection, and the band has little thickness to span |
| Wet or damp | seal or treat first, and a cement matrix absorbs |
| Level but not flat | the panel follows the floor; flatness is inherited |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
NTMA states the constraint that makes renovation terrazzo a narrow choice: a sand-cushion system cannot be installed in a renovation because the elevation cannot be found. What remains are epoxy, precast or a coating, and all three of them put the substrate directly into the finished floor — so whatever the slab is doing, the floor now does. A thin panel is the version of that with the least mass to distribute and therefore the least tolerance for a substrate that moves. The check that matters is not the flatness, which a panel will follow anyway; it is whether the slab has a crack in it.
What these figures are, and what they are not
The renovation limitation on sand-cushion systems and the crack-telegraphing behaviour are both from NTMA guidance. ⛔ We give NO deflection figure: the L/720 value in general circulation could not be traced to a standard and is not reproduced anywhere on this site. ⛔ We have not laid a floor over an existing slab and we do not install floors; a substrate assessment is the installer's work on site.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: