Why does the batch matter more than the colour?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| What has to match | Why |
|---|---|
| Cement batch | the matrix colour comes from the binder, not from the chips |
| Pigment batch | one colour layer, one batch, by clause |
| Pigment content | 3 to 6 per cent of the cement weight |
| The aggregate | graded the same way, or the pattern is visibly different |
| ⛔ What does not solve it | a screen colour, a photograph, a colour name |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
Terrazzo is normally specified for repeatability, which makes it unusually bad at matching an earlier batch: the colour is not a pigment added to a white base as a stain, it is the cement and a mineral pigment at 3 to 6 per cent, and both move slightly between batches. That is why the clause about one batch is written the way it is, and why it matters twice over: on a new floor it keeps the job internally consistent, and on a repair it is the reason a patch in a later batch is visible even when the colour name is the same. The practical answer is to order the repair material from the same production run as the floor, which means keeping a piece of the original panel.
What these figures are, and what they are not
The same-batch requirement, the same-factory requirement and the 3 to 6 per cent content are GB 50209-2010 clause 5.4.2. ⛔ We publish no batch number, no lead time and no guarantee that a later order matches an earlier one, and we do not offer a matching service: ⛔ what we do is say plainly that a second order is a second batch and will not match.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: