Terrazzo or microcement for a floor?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Terrazzo | Microcement | |
|---|---|---|
| What carries the wear | the aggregate at the surface | the coating itself |
| A local repair | patch and re-ground to match | a patch that shows |
| Re-groundable | yes, cement-bound and precast | no |
| Typical build-up | 1/2 in topping, or a thin system | a coating over a base |
| Variation between batches | controlled by the mix | a colour difference that has to be matched |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
Microcement and thin terrazzo occupy the same slot in a renovation — both go over an existing floor without a three-inch build-up — and they are chosen on the same basis. Where they part company is the repair. A microcement floor is a coating, so a damaged area is a patch, and matching a patch to a hand-trowelled surface is a matter of skill rather than of chemistry. A terrazzo floor carries the stone through its thickness, so grinding a repair back into the surrounding floor is a process that leaves no obvious seam. Neither is the better floor; they are different answers to "how much do I expect this to be damaged".
What these figures are, and what they are not
⛔ No thickness figure for microcement appears here, because we could not trace one to a standard and the numbers in trade copy are not reproduced. The terrazzo build-ups are from the NTMA systems table. ⛔ We do not supply microcement and nothing here is a comparison of two products we both sell.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: