Poured terrazzo or terrazzo tile?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Poured | Tile | |
|---|---|---|
| Seams | none, if divider strips are used only as a pattern | grout joints on every edge |
| Repair | patch the hole, re-ground the whole area | lift and replace the one tile |
| Install | wet, then ground on site | dry, set like any tile |
| Height | 3 in on a sand cushion, or 1/2 in bonded | the tile thickness only |
| Renovation | ⛔ sand cushion cannot be added to a finished floor | the usual answer |
| Seams and dirt | nothing to catch in | dirt collects in the joints over time |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
The seamless argument is real and it is also the reason poured terrazzo is specified in lobbies and stations: a floor with no joints has nowhere for dirt to sit and nothing to crack along. But seamless is not the same as permanent, and the two claims get confused. A poured cement floor is ground together with its slab, so when it is damaged the repair is a patch and then a re-grinding of a much larger area, because you cannot grind a small patch flat against the surrounding finish. A tiled floor fails one tile at a time and the replacement is one tile. Over forty years on a floor that gets hit, that difference usually decides it — and it decides against seamless.
What these figures are, and what they are not
The build-ups and the sand-cushion renovation limitation are from the NTMA Terrazzo Systems Reference Guide and NTMA guidance. ⛔ The claims about repair scope and dirt are how the systems behave in use; they are not measurements, and we have not tested a floor we supplied. No cost figure appears on this page because we have not quoted one.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: