How is the chip mix chosen?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Chip | Effect on the surface | Where it suits |
|---|---|---|
| Fine | flat after grinding, tight, easy to keep clean | kitchens, wet areas, thin systems |
| Medium | the conventional look, pockets stay shallow | general floors |
| Large | reads as aggregate, deep pockets hold dirt | feature floors, thick systems |
| Glass | highest contrast, and brittle under a point load | ⛔ not in a working kitchen |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
Grading is what makes terrazzo a surface rather than a pattern. A single-sized chip lays flat and grinds unevenly, because the stones all present the same height to the grinder and the ones at the edge of a chip are levered out; a graded mix has stones of different sizes in the same depth, so as the grinder takes the surface down a new layer of stone is always coming up. That is also why the two-thirds rule matters beyond safety — it keeps the largest stone far enough below the face that the grinder reaches the matrix before it levers a chip out, and at 8 millimetres that ceiling is about 5.3.
What these figures are, and what they are not
The two-thirds relationship is JC/T 507-2022 clause 5.3 and the chip ceiling at each thickness is our arithmetic on it. The grading practice is NTMA's published customary use per system. ⛔ The advice about glass in a working kitchen is general: we have no impact test on any mix and no figure supports it.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: