Is porcelain terrazzo real terrazzo?
Reference photographs. They show the material and the finish; they are not photographs of goods we made, and the colour on screen is not a colour-match.
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Property | Porcelain terrazzo | Real terrazzo |
|---|---|---|
| Matrix | fired clay | cement or resin with aggregate |
| Aggregate depth | printed, surface only | through the full thickness |
| Water absorption | near zero | typically 0.3-0.6% |
| Cost per m2 | low | materially higher |
| Repair | replace the tile | patch and re-ground |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
The cost difference is not a quality judgement, it is a thickness difference. Terrazzo has to be ground to a flat surface, which means handling material twice and curing it properly; a printed tile is fired once. What the buyer is choosing between is a floor and a picture of a floor, and the honest answer says so.
What these figures are, and what they are not
No figures in the left column are ours. The absorption range applies to cement-bound terrazzo specifically and does not apply to resin-bound, which is why this table names the binder in every row.
If you are specifying this
We have not published products against this question yet. Send us the process, thickness and quantity and we will quote it against what we can actually form, rather than against a catalogue.