Why is terrazzo more expensive than porcelain?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Cost driver | Porcelain | Terrazzo |
|---|---|---|
| Process | pressed and fired | cast, cured, ground, polished |
| The face | printed | the aggregate itself |
| If it dulls | nothing to do | grind and polish again |
| Sealing | none | by grade, refreshed |
| Largest format | very large sizes available | bounded by joint design, not by size |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
The comparison that settles this is not the invoice but the twenty-year one. Porcelain is cheaper to buy and cheaper to install, and it is a finished product when it leaves the kiln. Terrazzo is a material that has not been finished until the grinding is done on site, which is why the labour is in the price and why the same floor costs more in a country with good terrazzo trades than in one without. What the money buys is a surface with stone in it: when a porcelain tile wears through its print there is nothing underneath to grind back to, and on a terrazzo floor there is.
What these figures are, and what they are not
⛔ NO PRICE, RATE OR PERCENTAGE APPEARS ON THIS PAGE, and none is available from us: we have not published a price list and we do not quote one in writing. ⛔ The cost drivers described are why the two are not comparable at the point of purchase; a buyer who needs a number should send the form, the thickness, the finish and the quantity, and we will quote against the aggregate and the batch we can control.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: