Terrazzo tile or porcelain tile?
The figures, and where each one comes from
| Real terrazzo tile | Terrazzo-effect porcelain | |
|---|---|---|
| Body | cement with real stone chip through it | fired clay, uniform |
| Surface | ground, can be re-ground | a printed glaze, wears through |
| Sealing | needed, and refreshed | not needed |
| Water | graded 8.0% down to 1.0% by class | near zero |
| Repair | replace the tile | replace the tile |
| Standard | EN 13748-1 covers cement-bound terrazzo tile | covered as a ceramic tile |
Why the processes are not interchangeable
The second test is the one that catches a printed tile in a showroom. Lay six or eight of them out on the floor: a printed surface has a limited number of faces, so the same cluster of chips comes round again. Real aggregate does not repeat. And the consequence that matters is maintenance rather than appearance — a terrazzo floor that has dulled after ten years of traffic can be ground back, because the aggregate is the surface. A printed tile at the same point has worn through its pattern and the only repair is replacement.
What these figures are, and what they are not
The difference in body and in repairability is what the two products are. ⛔ The absorption grades are JC/T 507-2022 table 7 for the Chinese classes; EN 13748-1 covers cement-bound terrazzo tile for internal use and its scope was read, but ⛔ we have not confirmed the standard's current status with CEN and are not reproducing its numeric limits. ⛔ No price comparison appears: we have not quoted one for either product.
If you are specifying this
These are the forms we actually supply for this question, with production photographs where we have them: